- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To President
- Became Law
Overview
This bill would restrict access to single-sex facilities on federal property based on biological sex, affecting how schools, workplaces, and other federal facilities handle restroom and locker room policies.
Law Today
The bill does not spell out the prior law. Federal policy on access to single-sex facilities on federal property is not detailed in the title or summary provided.
If Passed
This bill would require that on federal property, individuals must use single-sex bathrooms, locker rooms, and similar facilities that match their biological sex at birth. This would directly affect Christian families by reinforcing legal protections for sex-separated spaces, which many Christian parents view as important for privacy, safety, and the dignity of their children.
AI-generated from the bill text — verify against the official text.
Should I support this?
- Strongly Oppose
- Likely Oppose
- Neutral
- This billLikely Support
- Strongly Support
Likely Support
From a Christian family perspective that values parental authority, biological distinctions, and protection of children's safety and modesty, this bill reinforces legal boundaries around sex-separated spaces on federal property—aligning with traditional teachings on sex differences and parental responsibility to safeguard their children's dignity and privacy.
AI assessment using F3’s editorial criteria — faith, family, and freedom. This is F3’s policy judgment; verify the provisions in the official bill text.
Likely supporters & opponents
Likely support
- Religious-liberty and traditional-values advocacy organizations — Biological sex-separated spaces uphold longstanding standards of modesty and privacy rooted in religious and traditional beliefs about the sexes.
- Parental-rights advocates — Parents have a right to ensure their children use facilities consistent with biological sex to protect their privacy and safety.
- Women's-safety organizations — Sex-separated spaces based on biological sex provide necessary privacy and security for women and girls.
Likely opposition
- LGBTQ-rights advocacy organizations — Restricting facility access to biological sex discriminates against transgender and non-binary individuals and denies them equal dignity and access.
- Civil-liberties groups — Such restrictions may violate constitutional protections and infringe on individual liberty and expression.
AI-inferred typical positions based on the bill’s substance — general stakeholder categories, not confirmed endorsements.
Official summary
To prohibit individuals from accessing or using single-sex facilities on Federal property other than those corresponding to their biological sex, and for other purposes.
Sponsors
- Nancy Mace (R)
- Andrew Ogles (R)
- Michael Rulli (R)
- Mary Miller (R)
- Diana Harshbarger (R)
- Barry Moore (R)
- Brandon Gill (R)
- Lauren Boebert (R)
- Riley Moore (R)
- Ronny Jackson (R)
Status timeline
- 2025-02-05Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.H
- 2025-02-05Introduced in HouseH
H = House · S = Senate · A = Assembly